The revolution will be tweeted

I have been following the events in Iran fairly closely.  It is truly astonishing the role that technology has played in getting information both out to the world and back to those demonstrating against the election results.  Here’s what I’ve used:

Twitter:  I’ve followed the #iranelection feed, however the signal to noise ratio is extremely low.  Still fascinating to follow the social interactions.

The Lede Blog:  A more filtered look at what’s happening.

The Guardian (UK) blog:  A good compromise between Twitter and Lede.  More signal, less noise.

Huffington Post blog:  A little more raw, and with a liberal twist.  While I don’t favor any political leanings on this issue, this one entry from 1:19 pm Wednesday struck a real chord:

1:19 PM ET — Good news. The medical student in Iran I referenced below finds his young daughter, who had gone missing in the crowds. The tweets are from over the last hour or so:
are parent you know how hard it is to be away from a injured child


but her life is more important than my life and putting her in dange is not what i want if you 
she is very scared now i am sure she hates gunfire and darkness
i just want to hold her again to kiss her forehead ..to be free with her…to see her run free in the park
we students do not chant death to america we want american constitution

ok so i know my daughters safe.. 

 

Posted in News, Politics | Leave a comment

Time: Cookies got Abu Jandal to talk

Link:

Abu Jandal’s guards were so intimidated by him, they wore masks to hide their identities and begged visitors not to refer to them by name in his presence. He had no intention of cooperating with the Americans; at their first meetings, he refused even to look at them and ranted about the evils of the West. Far from confirming al-Qaeda’s involvement in 9/11, he insisted the attacks had been orchestrated by Israel’s Mossad. While Abu Jandal was venting his spleen, Soufan noticed that he didn’t touch any of the cookies that had been served with tea: “He was a diabetic and couldn’t eat anything with sugar in it.” At their next meeting, the Americans brought him some sugar-free cookies, a gesture that took the edge off Abu Jandal’s angry demeanor. “We had showed him respect, and we had done this nice thing for him,” Soufan recalls. “So he started talking to us instead of giving us lectures.”

It took more questioning, and some interrogators’ sleight of hand, before the Yemeni gave up a wealth of information about al-Qaeda — including the identities of seven of the 9/11 bombers — but the cookies were the turning point. “After that, he could no longer think of us as evil Americans,” Soufan says. “Now he was thinking of us as human beings.”

Hard to believe… well, actually it’s not.  These people are taught that us “evil Americans” will rape and torture them when we get them in custody.  Soufan proved those beliefs wrong…

… then Cheney, Gonzalez, the CIA, and Abu Ghraib proved them right. 

Torture
Doesn’t
Work.

Posted in News, Politics | 2 Comments

Cheney’s self-serving speech

After reading the speech in it’s entirety several times, I have to say it is the quintessential “Yes we did it, and thought it was right” speech.  It is also a perfect example of the black and white thinking that even psychologists say is present in conservatives.

From Cheney’s speech:

So we’re left to draw one of two conclusions – and here is the great dividing line in our current debate over national security. You can look at the facts and conclude that the comprehensive strategy has worked, and therefore needs to be continued as vigilantly as ever. Or you can look at the same set of facts and conclude that 9/11 was a one-off event – coordinated, devastating, but also unique and not sufficient to justify a sustained wartime effort.

That’s it, those are the only two choices he presents. There is no middle ground. You either support his views, or you don’t and you’re asking for another attack on this country. No middle ground. No shades of grey. No compromise.

Some may quote this section as a rebuttal:

The administration seems to pride itself on searching for some kind of middle ground in policies addressing terrorism. They may take comfort in hearing disagreement from opposite ends of the spectrum. If liberals are unhappy about some decisions, and conservatives are unhappy about other decisions, then it may seem to them that the President is on the path of sensible compromise. But in the fight against terrorism, there is no middle ground, and half-measures keep you half exposed. You cannot keep just some nuclear-armed terrorists out of the United States, you must keep every nuclear- armed terrorist out of the United States. Triangulation is a political strategy, not a national security strategy. When just a single clue that goes unlearned … one lead that goes unpursued … can bring on catastrophe – it’s no time for splitting differences. There is never a good time to compromise when the lives and safety of the American people are in the balance.

But once again we see the absolute thinking in action: “no middle ground.” He outright says that to debate and compromise on policy will bring another attack. This combines uncertainty avoidance, fear and agression, and terror management in an attempt to persuade the listener.

Cheney’s speech was a self-justification of his ideals and actions. Cheney is defending his decisions as well as those of the Bush administration. Since they are under attack, it’s completely understandable for him to do so. However, I disagree with his actions, and his justifications for those actions, and conclusions about the results of those actions.

Mr. Cheney has given the terrorists even more ammunition with his actions after 9/11, as well as his current arguments defending said actions.  Here is what the terrorists most likely concluded post-9/11:  America under Bush and Cheney didn’t stand for the ideals that it touted. America will treat terrorists just like they treated us, thus America must be destroyed not only for the great evil of freedom, but the hypocrisy of touting freedom while holding and torturing people in violation of the very laws America says it holds dear. Not only that, but it re-writes said laws to justify it’s illegal actions.  Terrorists see 9/11 not only as a successful attack that brought down two symbols of American greed, but as their successful exposure of what America really is:  a nation of hypocrites.

That is what the terrorists and their sympathizers see. That is what they tell their recruits. Thank you, Mr. Cheney, for giving them this victory.  You dragged America down to their level.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Anatomy of a biased poll

I see that Fox News has released a poll, from which they are claiming 71% of respondents want “less government in their lives.”  Considering my distrust of Fox News’ intentions, i felt I should take a look at the actual polling questions (PDF file):

8. The Obama administration has recently said there are signs the economy is starting to improve. Do you believe the economy is starting to get better, or is it that the administration is putting a positive spin on things?

Obvious loaded question. Kill the first sentence, then reduce it to “Do you believe the economy is getting better or worse?” This is much more neutral.

10. Based on Barack Obama’s criticism of Bush administration deficits during the presidential campaign, are you surprised the Obama administration is increasing the nation’s deficit, or not?

Not loaded, but a reflects the general bias of the poll.

14. Are you worried the country is moving away from capitalism and more toward socialism, or not?

Again, reflection of general bias. As is:

For reference: Does the news about stimulus packages and the federal government giving financial aid to several major corporations make you feel like the country is drifting away from capitalism and more toward socialism or don’t you feel that way?

The major objection I have to this is the implication that socialism is the bad thing as opposed to capitalism, the good thing. These two questions play upon unfounded fears and might influence more “yes” replies.

15. Which do you think would do more to improve the nation’s economy right now? (READ RESPONSES 1 AND 2)
SCALE: 1. Cutting taxes on individuals and businesses 2. Reducing federal spending by the government 3. (Both) 4. (Don’t know)

Where’s “Increasing taxes on wealthy individuals and large corporations,” “More spending by the government,” or even “neither?”

Very loaded question that was designed to get at least one answer the pollster wanted, and none they didn’t.

36. How do you think the Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution? (READ RESPONSES “1” AND “2”)
SCALE: 1. No matter what the outcome, the court should follow what the Framers meant when they wrote the Constitution
2. If necessary, the court should ignore what the Framers meant to reach the outcome it feels is appropriate for today

What about “The court should interpret what the framers wrote and apply it to modern circumstances?”

Look at the reference question asked in August, which is presented in the document after the above question:

For reference: Which of the following comes closest to your view of how the Constitution should be interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court? (ROTATE CHOICES) SCALE: 1. Judges should base their rulings on what they believe the Constitution’s framers meant when it was originally written 2. Judges should base their rulings on what they believe the Constitution means in today’s world 3. (In between/Combination) (Don’t know)

THAT is a more neutral question which is not designed to influence the response.

Again, the new question changes the “negative” reply to influence the desired response.

52. At the request of the American Civil Liberties Union, later this month the Pentagon will release photos of alleged detainee abuse by U.S. soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan. How likely do you think it is that the release of these photos will cause a backlash against the United States and endanger the lives of U.troops: Very likely, somewhat likely, not very likely or not at all likely?

The ACLU  portion probably should have been omitted, as most people view the ACLU as a “controversial” group, thus it might have some influence over the answer. However I don’t consider the question “loaded.”

65. Who do you think the White House will put in a muzzle first — Vice President Joe Biden or First Dog Bo?

Funny, but useless question.

To summarize:  this poll, while most questions being neutral or not obviously biased, is in itself biased and has loaded questions designed to elicit desired responses.   Typical for Fox News.

Posted in News, Politics | Leave a comment

Star Trek

I had been looking for any reason not to like this film.  I read the reviews on RottenTomatoes, especially seeking out the negative ones (Roger Ebert gives it a “meh” with 2.5 stars).  I hate remakes, and this had the initial stench of being yet another non-original remake that overdid the special effects.  But having seen every Trek film in the theater, and being able to identify every original series episode in twenty seconds (me and my college roommate competed to see who could name the episode first), I vowed to see it with an open mind.

To say it exceeded my expectations is an understatement, it blew them away completely.  This film is a must-see for both the trekker* and non-trekker.

* – Yes, I use “Trekker” not “Trekkie.”  I’m proud of my nerdiness.

Posted in Home | Leave a comment

Comparing apples to… Apples

One of the forums I frequent is the PackPride Brickyard.   It is occupied by general chatter of politics and life by and for NC State Wolfpack fans.

Yesterday, someone posted the following:

Reasons to buy Mac vs other laptop


are there any?

seems like you can buy a dell, hp, toshiba etc for almost half of what a mac costs.  given the same features.

After the myth that “Macs are overpriced” was bandied about, I posted a snippet from this article stating that when compared with identically equipped laptops from PC manufacturers, Apple laptops are competitive.

Later on, the original poster asked specifically:

so essentially this http://www.dell.com/content/products/productdetail s.aspx/xpsnb_m1530?c=us&l=en&s=dhs&cs= 19&~oid=us~en~29~xpsnb_m1530_anav3~~ vs the macbook pro 15inch.  http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MB470LL/A?mco= MTkzOTI0Mg

seems like the dell machine has more for less.  but again, i really don’t know anything so educate me if you please….

So, being the perfectionist that I am, took some time and responded:

Processor:  Both have a 2.4 GhZ Core2duo.   However the Dell has an 800Mhz Front Side bus, while  the MBP has a 1066 MhZ front side bus.  This means the Mac, while having the same speed CPU, can transfer data faster.  Overall this would amount to about a 4-5% speed boost for the Mac.

Memory:
Dell – 4GB Dual Channel 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM
MBP –
2GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM (expandable to 4GB).
The Dell has more memory, but the MacBook Pro is over 37% faster in the memory department.  Using lower speed memory than the processor FSB is one way Dell cut corners on the price.  This would give the Mac a significant speed boost.

Video:
Dell – 256MB NVIDIA®  GeForce®  8600M GT,
MBP –
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT graphics processor; and NVIDIA GeForce 9400M graphics processor with 256MB of DDR3 SDRAM.
The MBP has better video.  Actually it has two video chips.  The 9400 is lower power while the 9600 provides more speed for intensive applications.  You can select which one to use depending on your needs.

Those are the biggest differences I can point out.  From what I can tell, the Dell uses older, slower components to wring out the lowest price it can.   If you’re not interested in raw speed, then the Dell would be fine for you.  However if you want the “best” hardware, the Mac is better.

Now Microsoft is launching a new ad campaign which parallels this discussion.  It has a girl looking for a 17″ laptop for under $1000.   She goes into the Apple store, but comes out disappointed when all she sees under $1000 is the white Macbook.  “Guess I’m not cool enough for a Mac,” she says.

Later, she finds an HP Pavilion laptop with a 17″ screen for $699.   Since I don’t know the exact model, I looked on the Best Buy site for an HP Pavilion with a 17″ screen for under $1000.  Here’s the specs for the $699 model, with the 17″ MacBook Pro specs in parentheses:

Processor:  2.1GHz AMD Turion X2 on 800 MHz front side bus (MBP: 2.66 GHz Intel Core2Duo on 1066 MHz FSB)

Video:  Radeon HD 3200 (MBP: NVidia 9600 GT and 9400 M, yes two chips.  One for performance, one for power conservation.  You choose which one to use.)

RAM:  4GB DDR2 667 SDRAM (MBP:  4GB DDR3 1066 SDRAM)

Screen Resolution:  1440×900 (MBP:  1920×1200)

Weight:  7.8 lbs (MBP:  6.6 lbs.)

Price:  $699  (MBP:  $2799)

While the Pavilion would serve the needs of most computer users, the MacBook Pro is definitely a “beefier” computer spec-wise, however it is one pound lighter.  By comparison, an equivalently equipped computer directly from HP lists at around $2000, however it is still heavier and has lower screen resolution than the MacBook Pro.

Remember to check every computer’s specs in detail before deciding to buy.  Most PC makers skimp on parts to drive down the price as low as possible, but Steve Jobs has said “”We don’t know how to make a $500 computer that’s not a piece of junk, and our DNA will not let us ship that.”

Compare Apples to… apples.

Posted in Computers | Leave a comment

Éirinn go brách!

And a Happy St. Patrick’s day to you!

On this day the local pub, O’Connel’s, serves green beer en masse to the college throngs.  I, being somewhat of a connoisseur, refuse to partake of the dyed cheap beer.  Instead I prefer something a little more refined.   “Guinness” you may say?  Nay!  I prefer and recommend Murphy’s Irish Stout.  It’s sweeter than Guinness and much easier on the stomach.

So go to your local pub and order a pint.  If you like stout, you’ll love Murphy’s.

And don’t forget to pinch someone for not wearing green!

Posted in Home | Leave a comment

Remember “Those who cannot learn from history…?”

“What we learn from history is that we do not learn from history.”

– Benjamin Disraeli

This was quoted in a Barron’s article outlining how some of the blame for the current economic situation falls at the feet of our current purported savior:  the U.S. Government.

I’m a big fan of less government in our lives.  However this article indicates that less government oversight of the financial sector allowed the markets to essentially run amok, from Wall Street, to insurance, to the mortgage companies.  Does that mean that we should jump to the other extreme and allow government to dictate terms to these companies (e.g. telling AIG they cannot give millions in bonuses that they are contractually obligated to pay)?

To be honest, I don’t know the answer to that question.  But I feel the answer lies somewhere in between.

Posted in Politics | Leave a comment

Damn Telemarketers!

I’m getting calls and letters saying my vehicle’s warranty “is about to expire.”  My response:  “NO S__T SHERLOCK! My truck is 10 years old!”  This is obviously a scam to pressure me into buying some expensive and worthless “warranty.”

Here’s an article on MSNBC about this deceptive and high-pressure practice.

Don’t fall for it.

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Geek Fact for Today

2/18/09 = 0.0123456789

Only geeks will appreciate the significance of this.  For you non-geeks who don’t get it, here’s the word-problem version:

Divide 2 by 18, then divide that by 9.

p.s. – If I could figure out how to do the repeat notation I would, as “0123456789” repeats, but that would indicate my geekdom is off the scale.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment